← LEDGERLANDS
FFIGR / SUPER MODEL
RESEARCH EDITION 05 NOV 2026
FIGURE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS · NASDAQ: FIGR

Follow the loan.
Find the cash.

An operating model of Figure’s lending marketplace—from partner cohorts and fee tiers to the capital behind the earnings.

THE CENTRAL QUESTION

How much capital
must stay behind
for earnings to grow?

10quarters of reconciled
financial history
9,886source observations
with evidence grades
NEXT CHECKPOINT12 NOV ’26 ↗Q3 results · before the open
01 / SCENARIO WORKBENCH

See what the assumptions produce.

REVENUE$1.35BLegacy marketplace + Kiavi
ADJUSTED EBITDA$706MOperating scenario proxy
EPS PROXY$1.53Before unknown acquired amortization
CASH BEFORE DEBT FUNDING$333MAfter modeled capital requirements

SCENARIOS, NOT GUIDANCE Kiavi purchase accounting and working capital remain unresolved. EPS and cash are proxies, not fully reconciled GAAP forecasts. Read the gaps ↗

The earnings-to-cash gap

RevenueAdj. EBITDACash proxy

Annual model output · $ millions · Select a scenario above. Years 3–5 are mechanical extensions with weaker evidence.

Quarterly forecast Q3 2026 – Q2 2028 +
QuarterLegacy CLMKiavi volumeRevenueAdj. EBITDAEPS proxyCash proxy

$ millions except EPS. Q3 legacy volume is known preliminary data; financial figures are estimates.

02 / THE OPERATING MACHINE

Revenue is an output.

Every modeled dollar starts with a loan, a partner, a fee, or an asset balance.

01 / ORIGINATIONPartners & borrowers

Partner cohorts × activity × loan size

02 / MONETIZATIONFees & sale spreads

Channel mix × eligible dollars × realized yield

03 / CASHFunding & retained assets

Earnings − capital required − noncash gains

01

Volume ≠ fee eligibility

Partner volume, Connect volume and fee-bearing dollars have different definitions. Blended yields are derived, not universal contractual prices.

02

MSR gains have three parts

New rights, runoff and valuation changes affect earnings differently. The cash bridge reverses noncash recognition.

03

Kiavi is a separate cohort

Historical revenue and profit were disclosed. The post-acquisition revenue, capital and amortization bridge is still incomplete.

03 / WHAT MOVES THE ANSWER

Capital is the cash sensitivity.

One leaf at a time, across its stated bear and bull range. Input ranges are subjective and correlated.

FY2027 change in cash proxy, $M. The leading five account for about 71% of the selected squared-range diagnostic—not a probability or measured forecast variance.

View the complete sensitivity and capacity chartCash sensitivity tornado and illustrative buyer capacity threshold chart
04 / OPEN THE ASSUMPTIONS

Show your working.

Derived inputs carry an E grade. Undisclosed choices are marked PLUG. Source grades describe evidence, not the certainty of a forecast.

Operating leafBearBaseBullUnits / provenance

RESEARCH NOTE / 01

What changed after checking the sources

Item Source-verified correction Model consequence
Kiavi consideration Approximately $590M net of acquired cash at closing, versus $532.4M June agreement Use closing cash, and actual $586.5M note proceeds; do not use gross $600M as proceeds. [E2, F1]
Kiavi economics Management disclosed FY25 revenue >$250M, EBITDA >$100M, volume~$7B Historical floors exist; post-JV revenue/cost accounting remains unknown. [T3]
Q3 volume $5.119B explicitly excludes Kiavi One September month is separate; do not double count or assume new historical series comparability. [E1]
Near-term demand October preliminary $1.67B versus September rounded $1.78B Base Q4 legacy anchor is 3×October≈$5.01B, not the old unsupported $5.6B. No claim of seasonally adjusted decline. [D1]
Servicing $16.0B weighted-average HELOC UPB; $17.341B total ending UPB Forecast stock, new servicing and runoff separately. [F1]
Q2 MSR gain $31.807M creation −$11.109M runoff +$8.395M valuation =$29.093M Separate noncash creation/runoff from valuation. [F1]
EBITDA quality $119.379M includes~$5.9M realized Reflow disposal gain Recurring comparison≈$113.5M before other judgments; no recurring sale gain forecast. [F1, T1]
History Q3’25 net take 4.4%; Q4’25 EBITDA 81.330M; latest-vintage Q1’26 EBITDA 82.613M Corrected source series; original vintages retained. [F1, F2, E3]
Next checkpoint November 12 before open; 8:30 am ET call Fixed review date, not unspecified mid-November. [D2]
RESEARCH NOTE / 02

Business as a machine

There is one reportable segment. Figure-branded origination, partner LOS, Connect, servicing and digital products are operating channels. Figure earns fees on loan dollars, gains when loans are sold, servicing income on outstanding balances, and income from financed assets. Loan timing, retained capital and fair-value accounting sit between volume growth and cash. Kiavi adds a separately acquired loan cohort from September 1; its pre-acquisition interest-led P&L changes as RTL assets move to the Sixth Street structure. [F1, T3]

schematic.md contains three complete Mermaid diagrams: legacy revenue, cost/capital/cash, and Kiavi. The core chain is:

01 / ORIGINATIONPartners & borrowers

Partner cohorts × activity × loan size

02 / MONETIZATIONFees & sale spreads

Channel mix × eligible dollars × realized yield

03 / CASHFunding & retained assets

Earnings − capital required − noncash gains

RESEARCH NOTE / 03

Metric harvest and reporting frame

The long register contains 9,886 source observations and 2,034 concept/dimension IDs, including duplicate source vintages: A 8,015; B 236; C 1,502; D 66; E 67. A means audited-or-XBRL per this workflow; it does not imply interim statements were audited. Assumptions are separate PLUG leaves and are not promoted into disclosed grades. guidance_ledger.csv retains 68 rows including historical preliminary-result ranges, distinguished from prospective guidance. [harvest_summary.json]

Coverage: four available periodic filings with native extension/dimensional XBRL, IPO S1 financial history, eleven SEC response letters,19 8-Ks/30 documents, twelve unique Koyfin events including four earnings calls, and 17 issuer-verified library events for context. 132 transcript files were screened because the FIGR folder also contains unrelated issuers. Numeric dispositions cover 1,199 Koyfin sentences and 1,901 tokens. This is not a claim of eight historical public earnings calls or literal exhaustive normalization of every historical public statement. [source manifests; transcript harvest summary]

Key comparability breaks:2024 separation/common-control perimeter; 2025 recombination; 2026 marketable-income reclassification; broadened CLM definition; adjusted-revenue/EBITDA changes; Prime correction/rename; pending Kiavi volume recast. Blank old marketable-income cells mean included elsewhere, not zero. No weighted-average share count or rate is quarterized by subtracting YTD averages. [F1–F3; definition_changes.csv]

RESEARCH NOTE / 04

Operating primitives, formulas and evidence

Output Primitive identity Evidence and weak edge
Partner volume Platform partner cohorts × assumed activity/productivity × ramp × demand/seasonality Partners 387→489 Q1→Q2; 3–6 month large-partner ramp. Active-share, churn and mature productivity unresolved; 489 is platform partners, not confirmed active producers. [T1, T2]
Technology fee Eligible loan dollars × effective fee yield Q2 fee 29.176M; fee-eligible subset undisclosed. Whole-CLM denominator is an E blended proxy. [F1, F3]
Ecosystem/program fees Connect dollars × fee yield + sold/securitized dollars × program yield Q2 ecosystem 36.768M/program 6.921M. Sliding tiers compress yield. [F1]
Origination Direct dollars × direct fee rate + nonConnect dollars × partner rate Q2 direct 23.533M on 723.075M; partner 2.813M on inferred nonConnect 762.786M. [F1, E derivation]
Sale gains Loans sold by eligible channel × realized spread; marks separate Q2 whole-loan realized 54.033M on rounded 2.5B sold. Current-period sale/production ratio is not a cohort identity. [F1]
Servicing Average serviced UPB × annual fee/4 Q2 fees 11.303M; average 16.0B, annualized effective~28 bp. Stock additions/runoff are explicit. [F1]
MSR Opening rights + created rights − runoff + valuation Q2 exact three-part bridge above; creation yield E, future marks scenario. [F1]
Interest Average held assets × yield + cash-income residual Coupon 8.8–9.0% is new-loan proxy; 24.5 day hold midpoint from 3–4 week statement. Residual 9.517M/q is E/PLUG. [F1, T1]
Processing / ads Loan dollars × processing unit cost; direct dollars × ad cost Q2 processing 19.940M; advertising/other 25.368M. December CFO~750/loan is a separate scope cross-check, not the processing-only rate. Avoid revenue percentage. [F1]
People/programs Functional salary pools × hiring/wage indices + professional/software programs Absolute functional headcounts undisclosed; indexed pools preserve this gap. [F1]
Funding / capital Held-loan days, advance rates, retained additions/runoff; balances × rates Contracts 80–100% advances; model 90%. Financing availability not guaranteed. [F1]
Kiavi Separate acquired volume × post-JV revenue/profit yields − integration cost + synergies Revenue/profit anchored to historical floors, not post-close guidance; 35M synergy target over 24 months, base half. [T3]

Every adjustable leaf has base/bull/bear values, units, provenance and rationale in assumptions.csv. Fixed anchor/allocation choices are in sources/model_anchors.json; machine-readable formulas/edge types in driver_tree.yaml. The forecast engine is model.py, and outputs are regenerated by build_model.py. FX is not an active primitive because no material non-USD operating exposure was identified. [Model]

RESEARCH NOTE / 05

History and calibration

Quarter CLM $M Revenue $M Adj EBITDA $M Net income $M
2024Q1 gap 75.3 gap -28.5
2024Q2 gap 80.8 gap 15.1
2024Q3 1,450.5 101.0 49.4 27.4
2024Q4 1,171.8 83.9 15.5 5.9
2025Q1 1,365.1 84.5 28.3 -0.6
2025Q2 1,838.0 106.1 52.9 30.0
2025Q3 2,469.4 156.4 86.4 89.8
2025Q4 2,704.6 159.9 81.3 15.1
2026Q1 2,902.4 167.0 82.6 45.0
2026Q2 4,258.8 225.6 119.4 87.4

Source: history.csv → canonical_history_long.csv accession/table/formula. Definitions differ across the marked presentation break; see that column before calculating growth or margins.

All 50 historical accounting identities pass: revenue components, expense components, operating profit, pretax and net income. That demonstrates arithmetic integrity, not forecasting skill. A Q1-only effective revenue yield applied to actual Q2 volume overpredicts Q2 revenue by 8.63% ($19.47M). Even supplying the actual volume does not fix mix/rate/sale-timing differences. Behavioral edges therefore have ranges, not fitted point estimates presented as empirical laws. [calibration.csv]

Prospective Q2 volume guide $3.8–4.1B versus actual $4.259B beat the high end 3.9%; Q3 guide $4.8–5.2B versus preliminary $5.119B is within range. LatestQ3 financial guidance did not specify sufficient revenue/cost primitives for a blind full-P&L test. Q3 volume in this forecast is conditioned on known preliminary data; Q4 is calibrated to October, so neither is advertised as an out-of-sample success. [guidance_backtest.csv; T1, T2, E1]

Q2 source bridge: net income 87.436 −MSR valuation 8.395 +marketable FV2.195 +digital/investment FV1.068 +registration 0.842 +acquisition 4.676 +restructuring 0.002 +SBC26.098 +software amortization 4.352 +nonfunding interest 5.553 −tax benefit 4.448 =adjusted EBITDA 119.379 ($M). Funding interest 14.117 remains deducted. Normalized tax 26% is CFO's longer-term statement; actual cash tax timing remains uncertain. [F1, T1]

RESEARCH NOTE / 06

Forecast from leaves

All financial values below are $M except per-share figures. The EBIT field means finance-company operating earnings after funding interest, before corporate/nonfunding interest; it is not generic all-interest-added-back EBIT. EPS is a proxy before undisclosed Kiavi purchase-accounting amortization in the base/bull cases; bear includes an illustrative 10M/q amortization deduction. Cash is after modeled interest/tax/capex and balance investments but before new debt funding, with unknown base Kiavi incremental working capital set tozero and prominently flagged. These are not fully reconciled GAAP EPS/CFO forecasts.

Base period Legacy CLM Kiavi volume Revenue Adj EBITDA proxy EPS proxy Cash proxy
2026Q3 5,119 595 262.4 137.6 0.28 35.3
2026Q4 5,010 1,821 302.0 151.2 0.32 82.1
2027Q1 5,217 1,857 308.6 155.2 0.32 75.7
2027Q2 6,298 1,894 340.8 179.5 0.39 61.4
2027Q3 6,549 1,932 348.5 184.0 0.40 94.6
2027Q4 6,764 1,971 354.7 187.5 0.41 101.3
2028Q1 6,882 2,010 358.1 188.7 0.41 108.3
2028Q2 8,172 2,050 392.6 214.3 0.48 94.1

Q3’26 legacy volume is preliminary known data, all financials estimated. Q4 volume anchor 3×October is a calibration, not a company guide. Q3 Kiavi month is estimated from a historical annual run-rate. [Model; E1; D1; T3]

FY2027 Bear Base Bull
Total loan volume $B 23.2 32.5 43.5
Revenue $M 799 1,353 1,934
Adj EBITDA proxy $M 237 706 1,199
Operating earnings after funding $M 1 576 1,129
EPS proxy $ -0.23 1.53 3.35
Cash before debt funding $M -26 333 651
Cash after modeled funding draws $M 62 408 745

Scenario differences are operating choices: partner adds 25/60/100 quarterly; first-quarter ramp 25/50/75%; mature productivity−2.5/0/+2.5%quarterly; direct demand−2/2.5/6%; tier-fee retention 97/99/100%quarterly; held days 35/24.5/21. All are labeled ranges/assumptions, not management promises. Cash-capital choices intentionally widen downside. Kiavi profit-yield and reported revenue-yield are separate: reported revenue affects a residual cost equally, so unchanged profit under that presentation shock is imposed, not evidence that Kiavi revenue uncertainty is harmless. [assumptions.csv; model.py]

Base annual Revenue Adj EBITDA proxy EPS proxy Cash proxy
2027 1,353 706 1.53 333
2028 1,549 835 1.83 464
2029 1,719 933 2.04 586
2030 1,876 1,017 2.19 674
2031 2,092 1,157 2.49 716

Years 3–5 are mechanical scenario extensions with weaker evidence. terminal_l1.csv gives a 2032 flat-quantity L1 snapshot; no terminal multiple, perpetuity growth or DCF value is asserted. The 2031 notes are assumed refinanced; corporate principal repayment is not silently counted as distributable cash. [Model]

RESEARCH NOTE / 07

Sensitivities, unit contribution and the crux five

Top cash leaf Bear Δ cash $M Bull Δ cash $M Share of squared-range diagnostic
retention_rate -81.6 40.8 24.9%
retained_runoff -62.3 43.4 18.5%
acquired_wc_cash -80.0 0.0 10.6%
gain_on_sale_yield -48.2 29.1 9.9%
connect_step -44.6 22.3 7.4%

The top five account for 71.4% of the chosen independent equal-weight uniform-input squared-range diagnostic. That is a sensitivity-ranking device, not measured forecast variance or a probabilistic confidence interval. Input ranges are subjective and correlated. EBIT/EPS rankings differ; full year 1/year 3 tornadoes and 15-leaf full-chain local derivatives are in sensitivities.md andCSV.

Crux Current anchor / base choice Falsifier and when
Retained investment rate Q2 retained securities 354M; base new retention 1.5% of modeled sold flow, undisclosed Required rate>2.5% or collateral haircut; Q3 balance/cash notesNovember 12.
Retained runoff No disclosed full maturity vintage; base 10%quarterly Actual repayments fail to cover 5% of opening balance; next two filings.
Kiavi incremental cash Closing~590M; base incremental WC0 is an open gap, adverse 20M/q Cash demands beyond acquisition consideration or retained/JV capital; purchase allocation andQ3 cash flow.
Realized sale yield Q2 whole-loan 54.033M /rounded 2500M≈2.16% <1.6% on comparable loan mix or sale lag extends; Q3 note/MD&A.
Connect migration Q2 Connect 2772.935/partner 3535.721≈78.4%; base+1 percentage point/quarter Adoption stalls, tier pressure exceeds assumed range, or legacy sale economics disappear faster; November 12 print.

Sources: F1, E2; model assumptions and sensitivity.csv. Historical Q3’25 management illustration was 3%ecosystem +40 bpsecuritization +25 bpannual servicing; this is not a universal current Connect contract. It cannot be directly compared with the latest blended effective fee without eligible-volume/tier data. [transcript register, Q3’25 CEO]

Street-implied values are unavailable because no verifiable consensus series was sourced. No invented disagreement with consensus is claimed.

FY2027 partial transaction contribution per $1,000 loan dollars Base
Direct 40.56
Connect 14.73
Non-Connect 46.78

This is a partial transaction contribution: attributable fees plus assumed realized sale/program economics, less dollar-driven processing and direct advertising. Common people, funding, servicing and credit costs are excluded because channel allocations are undisclosed. Sale participation is an inferred timing ratio, so these are not audited channel margins. MSR creation and marks are excluded from this cash-transaction view. Low-capital Connect can be economically attractive without maximizing reported revenue per loan dollar. [Model]

MSR valuation alone is removed from adjusted EBITDA and reversed in the cash bridge, although tax timing and future MSR runoff can create indirect cash consequences. A genuine deterioration in borrower credit, loan-sale demand or servicing collections is a different joint shock. The capacity curve is illustrative buyer capacity, not contracted funding or a forecast of the exact threshold. [validation.json; thresholds.csv]

RESEARCH NOTE / 08

Monitoring and implementation

Use the weekly issuer dashboard for volume, but do not equate on-chain transfers/write-scope activity with unique loans, revenue, or cash. November 12 must reconcile legacy versus Kiavi volume, new historical definitions, purchased assets, retained capital and contribution. The existing production nowcast configuration still contains pending-Kiavi and old-guide values; this run does not use those stale assumptions. super_model/FIGR/monitor.py saves independent local snapshots and sends no messages. Full cadence/falsifier/caveat table: monitoring.md. [D1; local pipeline config]

RESEARCH NOTE / 09

What remains uncertain

The five largest gaps are retained-asset cohort funding, Kiavi post-JV accounting/cash, fee eligibility and tiering, sold-loan vintage timing, and functional headcounts/productivity. The model uses named E/PLUG nodes for each. The ylds_balance leaf is presentation-only, affecting the adjusted-revenue denominator; it has no independent earnings/cash sensitivity. YLDS35 bp and Prime 50 bp pricing statements are captured; gross standalone fee illustrations are not added to consolidated earnings because existing interest/residual lines and intra-group activity require a revenue bridge. A Q2 gross-cash-minus-debt EV is inappropriate without separating servicing collections, YLDS backing, restricted balances and future collateral needs. Cash/loan interest splits, realized funding costs and tax timing are not fully known. Standalone Kiavi historical floors do not fix post-close GAAP revenue. [F1, F3, T3]

RKT and UWMC primary-source peer checks were used only to interrogate cost/holding assumptions. Rocket's loan holding time is on a weeks scale; UWM’s incentives make direct-cost behavior nonstationary. Neither supplies Figure's missing cost elasticity; no peer coefficient is transplanted. FNTK health was up, but most Q&A calls returned timeout errors; direct filings replaced them. The capital-structure tool succeeded and its extracted skyline is preserved under sources/tool_outputs/capital_structure/, with subsequent events checked separately. [tool logs; peer_edge_check]

This run delivers the requested source register, guidance ledger, historical reconciliation, driver tree, eight-quarter and longer scenario forecasts, sensitivities, monitoring and questions. It does not certify every harvest gate as fully resolved: full historical KPI disappearance testing is constrained by four available earnings calls,554 captured narrative passages are not all normalized, and the forward tree cannot be independently validated at every hidden primitive. These limits are part of the deliverable, not filled with invented observations. Detailed questions and every PLUG: open_questions.md.

RESEARCH NOTE / 10

Source appendix and reproduction

  • F1: Q2 2026 10-Q, accession 0001628280-26-057061, filed August 14. Notes 4–6,8,12,14; MD&A KPI, revenue/cost and non-GAAP tables. Local raw/text/instance: harvest_filings/2026-08-14_10-Q_000162828026057061.*.
  • F2: FY2025 10-K, accession 0002064124-26-000009, filed March 16; Q1 2026 10-Q0002064124-26-000029; Q3 2025 10-Q0002064124-25-000032; final IPO S-1/A0001628280-25-041837. Exact paths/table indexes in harvest_filings/canonical_history_long.csv.
  • F3: SEC company response, August 18 2025, comments 11–12: fee-eligible partner subset; sales timing; KPI meaning. Eleven correspondence responses retained.
  • E1: Q3 preliminary release, accession 0001493152-26-046036, October 6 event; source raw sources/q3_2026_prelim_ex99-1.htm. CLM excludes Kiavi; prior series to be recast.
  • E2: Kiavi closing 8-K0001493152-26-040931, September 1; approximately $590M net consideration and assumed/decommissioned financing details. Files in harvest_releases/sources/.
  • E3: Four earnings releases and amendments,19 8-Ks,30 raw documents; URL/date/table row and exact signed units in harvest_releases/metrics.csv. Q3’25 net take 4.4%; corrected Prime matched offers $22M atSeptember 30’25.
  • T1: transcript_downloads/FIGR/Figure_Technology_Solutions_Aug_13_26_002.txt: Michael Tannenbaum and Minchung Kgil, Q2 earnings; individual line/speaker references in harvest_transcripts/metric_register_transcripts.csv.
  • T2: Figure_Technology_Solutions_May_12_26_002.txt, Q1 earnings; Figure_Technology_Solutions_Feb_26_26_004.txt, Q4 earnings. Use verified source manifest for duplicate filenames.
  • T3: June 10 Kiavi acquisition call, Figure_Technology_Solutions_Jun_10_26_001.txt: CFO historical Kiavi revenue/EBITDA; management post-JV economics and cost synergies. Exact canonical source filename/speaker/line recorded in transcript register.
  • D1: Issuer dashboard, retrieved November 5; dated window throughNovember 1. RawHTML and parsedJSON in sources/dashboard_current.*; October $1.67B is rounded preliminary.
  • D2: Q3 results announcement, October 22: November 12 before open,8:30 am ET call.
  • M1: sources/tool_outputs/market_cap.txt, current-run Massive snapshot $19.98 and August 7 XBRL cover share total 224.377872M. Snapshot is not guaranteed current when this report is opened.
  • Model: model.py, assumptions.csv, sources/model_anchors.json, forecast.csv, forecast_annual.json. All forward figures in this report are model outputs; not issuer disclosures or consensus.

The model package below includes the calculation engine, assumptions, forecasts and source register.

All large harvest files retain exact accession/context/dimension or transcript file/speaker/line. Source occurrences are not independent observations; first/last disclosure fields refer to the covered corpus, not first-ever public use. Forecast amounts are generated from the model, not hand-entered in the tables. Prior artifacts remain available for comparison.

TAKE THE WORK WITH YOU

The model, not just the conclusion.

Calculation code, source register, assumptions, forecasts, calibration and diligence questions. A dated snapshot of the research.